LANSARY. Nuclear Bring us the decision
Nuclear · screen the counterparty

Is this consortium partner safe to commit to before you sign?

A consortium partner, a JV member, a sub-tier — what looks clean on the contract can hide a parent, a control chain, or a sanctions or screening exposure one or two ownership tiers down.

Settled as the Teaming Evidence Pack
The exposure

Independence checks lean on what a counterparty declares. The tie that matters — the ultimate owner, the adverse control, the screening exposure — usually sits a tier or two below the name on the page, where a self-declaration never reaches.

What the Teaming Evidence Pack settles

Who you’d really be committing to.

Who really owns and controls them?
The parent, the control chain and the ultimate beneficial owner behind the name on the contract.
Is there a sanctions or screening exposure?
An adverse tie, a designation, or a control change that could be called in — traced before it surfaces mid-programme.
How sure are we?
Each finding graded against the published standard, and held in confidence.

Typical reader: a programmes or partnerships lead.

Why now

Who controls your partner is a live question.

Teaming across the nuclear supply chain now runs through statutory screening: “Civil Nuclear” is one of the 17 mandatory sensitive sectors under the National Security and Investment Act, and the 2024-25 annual report (22 July 2025) recorded 1,143 notifications, 56 call-in notices and 17 final orders across the regime. Add fuel-cycle sanctions exposure to a state supplier such as Rosatom, and who controls your teaming partner — one or two ownership tiers down — is a live question, not a formality. See what changed →

Engage

Name the partner you can’t afford to be wrong about.

We’ll trace who really owns and controls them, and any sanctions or screening exposure — to what grade, before you sign.

You may also be asking: Is the position defensible? · What are you really buying?